Policy Research
Manhattan CB9 Housing & Supportive Resources Analysis
Data-driven housing affordability and Fair Share analysis for Manhattan Community Board 9, including a revised decision framework for project evaluation.
Role: Community Fellow, Fund for the City of New York (Community Board 9)
Context
CB9 needed quantitative evidence that regional AMI-based "affordable" units and supportive housing siting patterns do not match neighborhood income realities or Fair Share goals in West Harlem.
Method / approach
Integrated ACS tract-level income data, a 12-project housing inventory with standardized AMI affordability testing, and a geocoded mental health/support services ecosystem. Quantified the AMI mismatch and supportive housing concentration, then translated findings into a tiered evaluation system and policy recommendations for board action.
Tools and technologies
- American Community Survey
- GIS / geocoded service inventory
- Housing pipeline database (2014- 2026)
- Data dictionaries & governance practices
- Policy decision framework design
Key deliverables
- In-depth CB9 housing and supportive resources report
- Analytical memo on AMI and housing research kickoff
- Decision-making framework and policy recommendations
- Documented data sources and reproducibility notes
Results / findings
- Identified a deep affordability gap: across 12 pipeline projects (2014- 2026), units marketed as affordable required incomes averaging $81,102 above the CB9 median income- a 125% affordability gap relative to neighborhood income.
- Highlighted severe cost burden in high-poverty tracts (e.g., Tract 219 / Manhattanville Houses, where 71.8% of renters are severely cost-burdened).
- Recommended prioritizing deep affordability at or below 30- 50% AMI and resisting further concentration of supportive housing without Fair Share accountability.